Application (pre-grant publication)
EM-ID: TAG-LESS IDENTIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL DEVICES VIA ELECTROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS
- Number
- 20170270198
- Published
- 2017-09-21
- Filed
- 2017-03-17
- Assignee
- DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Inventors
- SAMPLE; ALANSON, YANG; CHOUCHANG
- CPC
- G06F16/211; G06F16/334; G06F16/381
- Verdict
- Medium Notable software
- Source
- Google Patents · FreePatentsOnline
The keeper's note
Identifies individual electronic devices tag-lessly by reading their unique RF emission spectrum with a basic RFID reader and matching it to a known library.
Abstract
A technique for identifying individual instances of electronic devices. This is done by using a basic RFID reader to read the RF emissions from the electronic device to obtain an emitted electromagnetic spectrum and compare it to a library of emitted electromagnetic spectrums of different instances of that type of electronic device and, based on that comparison, finding a best match and identifying the electronic device as being a particular instance of that type of electronic device. This comparison may be made by computing Euclidean distances between vectors that are based on the measured electromagnetic spectrums.
Background
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THEDRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a depiction of an IT professional scanning the unique electromagnetic noise generated by the unmodified laptops in order to determine their unique IDs andrecover their asset management information.
FIG. 2 depicts the process of uniquely identifying an electronic device (in this case an unknown iPhone 6) based on its low frequency electromagnetic emissions. Panel A shows a low cost EM-ID reader recording the EM signature shown in panel B. This signature is thresholded to remove noise and the device's EM-ID is extracted as depicted in panel C. In order to identify what type of device it is, aclassification algorithm is done in panel D. Once the object type is known, it is compared to all other iPhone 6s in the database in order to recover its unique ID, as shown in panel E.
FIG. 3 shows representative frequency domain plots from 0 to 500 kHz of the EM signals from five different categories of devices. The distinctive patterns are a manifestation of the circuit topology and are unique to each device category.
FIG. 4 showsfrequency domain plots from 0 to 500 kHz of the EM signals for five identical toys. Sincethe same circuit is used in each device the frequency distributions are similar to each other, although close inspection shows that indeed there are small differences.
FIG. 5 shows a histogram of Euclidean distances between an unknown test toy A.sub.i and the five known toys A, B, C, D and E, whose